 |
The use of the Internet in
facilitating policy discussions
presented on the occasion of the
3rd PACT Global
Workshop on Financial Accountability & Transparency
Siam City Hotel, Bangkok,
Thailand
2-3 July 1998
Richard Labelle (rlabelle@web.net)
Consultant, UNDP SDNP
Information technology and knowledge
management for development
980702
Also see:
Report on the proceedings of the 3rd Annual Pact Global Workshop on Financial
Accountability and Transparency
Contents
-
Introduction
-
The
Internet for facilitating policy discussions and much more
-
What is the
Internet?
-
Why
is the Internet important in the development process?
-
What
is required for using the Internet as a tool for communications among decision
makers in developing countries?
-
What
limits Internet use in developing countries?
-
UNDP SDNP
-
What has the SDNP
taught us about using the Internet for development communications
Annexes
Introduction
I wish to thank the organizers of this conference,
and colleagues at UNDP in New York for inviting me to address you today.
For me, this is an opportunity to speak about recent experiences of using
the Internet for sustainable human development in over 44 of the poorer
countries of the developing world as part of UNDP’s SDNP, a networking
activity in support of sustainable human development.
The Internet
for facilitating policy discussions and much more
Policy discussions are but one very specific,
albeit important aspect of the development process. To do justice to the
topic of how the Internet has and continues to facilitate policy discussions
in the international development community, let us look at the decision
making process in general and consider policy discussions a special application.
Where appropriate, this presentation will focus on those Internet based
communication activities, behaviours, applications or examples that are
relevant to policy formulation.
How does access to the Internet and related technologies
affect communications?:
-
Faster, better quality communications and data manipulations
-
Extended reach around the world at very low costs
Versatile applications for exchanging information,
including options for:
-
Exchanging data in different formats: text, graphics,
images, animation, and now voice, video and multimedia
-
Point to point exchanges: email, Internet phone, CuSee-Me
(video)
-
Live group discussions: chat spaces; text, voice and
video conferencing
-
Broadcast dissemination: newsgroups, mailing lists,
push technologies and Internet ‘channels’
-
Data exchange: ftp, the Web (http)
-
Gathering statistics and obtaining feedback: online
counters, cookies, online forms, interactive forms and databases, etc.
-
Publishing in a variety of formats and with different
tools, including online databases: the Web
-
Options for privacy (PGP), 128 bit encryption (where
legal!), and private corporate TCP/IP networks (intranets) linked to the
Internet
-
Videoconferencing, video on demand, interactive video
(choose your own ending)
-
3D rendering of architectural and related plans (virtual
tours, entertainment / gaming)
-
Richer and more diverse knowledge resources available
online: users have the means for being better informed as a result of increased
access to these resources
-
Professional and business / work networks of colleagues,
associates, business resources and support services (intranets and knowledge
networks)
-
Online news services, including information gathering
services (EIU, etc.)
-
Online newspapers
-
Online commercial databases
-
Online job marts
A variety of different applications are emerging
for transaction processing:
-
GroupWare: for business collaboration
-
e-commerce (electronic commerce), including online shopping
-
Distance learning
-
Telemedicine
-
Online contract bidding (World Bank, ADB, CIDA, UNOPS
…)
The availability of versatile and powerful applications
for managing information, resources, ideas, knowledge and people:
-
Organizing, searching for, retrieving, sharing and presenting
information on and off line
-
Managing the information obtained, on and off line:
textual databases and indexing engines: search engines, etc.
-
Online automated translation (Systran: www.systransoft.com/)
-
OCR and document management, data mining
-
Business / professional collaboration (GroupWare: Lotus
Notes; conferencing; intranets, etc.)
Let us consider the features of the Internet that
have contributed and that are continuing to contribute to its ever increasing
popularity.
III. What is the Internet?
What is the Internet: 4 things
-
Computers
-
Connections
-
Information.
How did it come to be:
-
Moore’s Law
-
Metcalfe’s Law
-
Digitization
-
Deregulation
-
Technological convergence
-
Knowledge management in the information society.
Significance:
-
Applications
-
Resources: > 20 million servers online, nature
and structure of the information, indices and search engines, machine translation
services, etc.
-
Distribution and inequities: the information
rich and the information poor. Is access to information a fundamental human
right?
-
Efficient communications at all levels of
society and across all sectors of the economy around the world and across
that part of the universe the Earth is proximal to (i.e. <= 5 light
‘days’ from Planet Earth)
-
Trends: much more, much faster, eventually,
much easier?
-
Killer apps
IV. Why is the Internet
important in the development process?
Why would a developing country, including
some of the poorest countries in the world, want to divert precious resources
to invest in information technologies that for the great majority of their
people, are and will remain largely inaccessible for the foreseeable future?
How can these technologies, which require highly trained individuals, be
appropriate in countries where access to potable water, a reliable food
supply, primary health care and other basic needs are obvious priorities?
How will the Internet and related technologies help eradicate poverty,
promote sound environmental management, enhance the role of women, encourage
consensus decision making and promote good governance?
Here are a few elements of information
that contribute to the answers. These are based in part on the experience
of the UNDP SDNP
-
For efficiency and increased productivity.
Informed decision making is better decision making.
-
Because in cases where the information gap
is so great between the information rich and the information poor, a little
information can go a long way.
One of the characteristics of the Internet
which makes it particularly suitable for correspondents who may not have
English as their mother tongue, is the relative simplicity of textual and
multimedia communications: email and the Web. We are not talking raw data,
tables and cells of facts and figures, but simple text presented and /or
highlighted with multimedia to enrich the unit informational value of Internet
communications for the individual.
-
The Internet is now a mainstream and rapidly
growing application used for communications by millions of users worldwide.
It is cost effective and ubiquitous, (see the figures on Internet growth
and distribution.), with only a handful of countries without full Internet
access (in Africa, only the Congo Republic will not have full Internet
access shortly - For data on the state of the Internet in Africa, visit:
http://demiurge.wn.apc.org/africa/).
For governance
-
The ability to communicate and link freely
with counterparts around the corner and around the world using email and
the Web has empowered stakeholders for sustainable development in ways
that could not have been possible before the late 1980s. We shall consider
some examples of how the Internet has been used with great effect to influence
and change policies.
-
For accountability and transparency: for those
with access, the Internet is perceived to be a fair and equitable communications
vehicle, in part because it is not readily controlled by any one interested
party and participation in the Internet is not restricted by membership,
although in developing countries, access is limited by availability of
expertise and by the cost of equipment and connection fees.
-
Governments and other organizations concerned
with managing the development process and mobilizing citizens can use the
Internet to enhance the delivery of government or other services, as well
as information and data that governments and other stakeholders may not
be able to share readily with their citizens and other stakeholders for
a variety of reasons.
-
The concept of access to information as a
fundamental human right has been recognized and this becomes meaningful
with the advent of the Internet as we know it today. Kofi Annan, the Secretary
General of the United Nations, in a speech on the occasion of the GK97
conference that took place in Toronto in 1997, underlined the importance
attached to information and access to information.
-
For opening countries up to their own citizens
and stakeholders, and for presenting a national view of the country to
those outside national borders
-
So decision makers can acquire a basis for
comparing their situation with that existing in other countries, locations,
etc., in order to better appreciate what, if any advantages or disadvantages
they have, and to act on these accordingly
-
So that actors within country can have better
access to information and resources wherever these may be located
-
So that countries and stakeholders can have
their say, and share knowledge, experiences and information with stakeholders
near and far
-
To encourage and even permit greater access
to local knowledge resources, and, to encourage local sources of knowledge
and expertise to make this information available via the Internet
-
To inform and attract potential collaborators
and potential investors
-
For sound management: informed and networked
decision makers make better decisions and are more visible and therefore,
more accountable. Getting them to use the Internet is probably the first
step in securing this belief
-
For standardization / normalization: to share
information on standards
-
To increase participation in negotiations,
including treaties and conventions, in commercial and other contracts and
bids, etc.
-
For transaction processing.
V. What is
required for using the Internet as a tool for communications among decision
makers in developing countries?
At the very least, a basic understanding of the
nature, structure and potential of the Internet and of related technologies
and management practices that allows planners and other decision makers
to network among themselves and with an ever increasing number of like
minded people.
Unfortunately, in many developing countries, when
an Internet connection is available, linking via the Internet to resources
around the world is more readily achieved than accessing local knowledge
bases, and this is a priority issue for projects such as the UNDP SDNP
described below. For example, during a recent mission to Chad in the Sahel,
government decision makers were surprised to learn of over 4900 Internet
sites dealing with their country, of which less than 4 were produced in
the country itself!;
-
Some technical skills to achieve a basic level of implementation,
even on a pilot project basis; and,
-
Eventually, the means to manage and maintain and/or
upgrade or improve the technology and related applications while ensuring
the long term sustainability of the service. Business management skills
along with technical skills are especially needed.
These are rare commodities in many developing countries,
especially in smaller countries that occupy the lower tiers of the Human
Development Index (HDI). Furthermore, in nearly all countries, developing
or otherwise, many sectors of society and of the economy do not have access
to the Internet. The same is true in general for people and groups in rural
environments who are generally not connected. Solutions exist to help overcome
this situation, and technological innovations, including satellite and
wireless technologies, are appearing that will permit users to connect
wherever they may be at reasonable costs.
Several initiatives aim to foster greater use of
networking tools and of the Internet for development. In Africa alone,
there are over 70 such initiatives ongoing (see http://demiurge.wn.apc.org/africa/projects).
In general, there is as great a need to network the initiatives and efforts
of the donor countries as there is to help recipients in developing countries
(see the BellaNet Web site for more details: http://www.bellanet.org).
We shall consider one such initiative, UNDP’s Sustainable Development Networking
Programme (SDNP).
VI. What limits
Internet use in developing countries?
In the poorest of the poor countries, there are
economic activities. Governments operate and civil society also exists,
although they have far fewer resources than in other countries. People
communicate and transact business, albeit, under sometimes difficult circumstances
and at a much reduced scale when compared to other countries. Access to
the Internet can be useful for these countries, as long as there is a basic
capacity to use the technology. And in some of the poorer countries especially,
and in rural regions in general, as well as for many sectors of society
in developing countries, the capacity does not exist to exploit the Internet
and NICTs. Several initiatives are ongoing to help bridge this gap and
to help users, especially key decision makers, connect and become consumers
as well as providers of information.
A lack of trained personnel is the greatest limitation
to diffusion of the Internet in many developing countries. There is a threshold
of ‘technological know how’ that countries need to reach to ‘grow’ the
Internet sustainably. In some countries of Africa South of the Sahara,
there are insufficient technical and business management skills to operate
an Internet service provider (ISP). Even finding a technician trained in
TCP/IP, Unix and/or Windows NT, the operating systems of the Internet,
can be nearly impossible, although this is changing rapidly.
VII. UNDP SDNP
Since 1992, UNDP has supported the Sustainable Development
Networking Programme (SDNP). The objectives of the SDNP are to help developing
countries achieve sustainable human development by facilitating access
to information for decision making and by encouraging greater participation
by all stakeholders and especially by elements of civil society in the
decision making process itself.
The SDNP was initiated by Maurice Strong as
part of UNDP’s efforts to enact the recommendations of the Brundtland Commission.
In 1992, as a result of the Earth Summit, UNDP launched the SDNP to help
implement Agenda 21, the action plan on sustainable development. Agenda
21 recognizes the importance of access to information in order to achieve
the objectives agreed by the international community on the occasion of
the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED).
The SDNP adopts a participatory approach and
is based on a roundtable type of consultative mechanism to guide its operation.
SDNP initiatives try to achieve this by helping countries develop the capacity
to use networking technologies, and in particular the Internet and NICTs
in general. The technology is a means only, not an end.
SDNP operates in 40 developing countries. Negotiations
are ongoing between the SDNP and another 50 countries. A similar initiative,
SIDSNet links over 30 small islands developing states.
Current SDNP activities
-
Meeting place for National Stakeholders in SHD
-
Affordable Internet access
-
Develop a community with skills to utilize it
-
Participatory Approach
-
Content Development and Capacity Building
The SDNP is based on several principles (see www.sdnp.undp.org
for details) including the need to involve governments in the process of
setting up an SDNP activity as well as the concept of fair and equitable
access to information for all stakeholders for sustainable development.
SDNPs do the following things:
-
Promote and strengthen the consultative process through
the use of networking tools and technologies, especially the Internet,
and by bringing key decision makers together in a Steering Committee that
will be responsible for getting the project off the ground;
-
Support UNDP country programmes and national plans for
sustainable development;
-
Promote awareness through the consultative process,
conferences, seminars, etc. Again, these consultations involve key decision
makers at all levels;
-
Train users, including especially decision makers and
technical experts to exploit and manage the Internet and related resources.
Training trainers is the objective of technical training;
-
Help develop networking solutions for users, so they
too can be more than just passive users or consumers of mostly foreign
information, but so they can also contribute information directly to the
Internet. Priority is to work with users that may not have the financial
and human resources to exploit the Internet. The project installs PC based
servers and links these to the Internet;
-
Develop local content on the Internet. Specifically,
to develop local Web servers and sites, as well as related applications;
-
Develop management and business plans to exploit the
project and extend it;
-
In some cases, deal with Internet and telecommunications
policy issues, and make proposals for enhancing Internet use. In some countries,
the SDNP lays then groundwork for the creation of a national Internet Society
to promote the Internet;
-
Work closely with existing initiatives, such as those
undertaken by the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), other
donors (USAID’s Leland Initiative in Africa), the World Bank, IDRC, etc.,
in order to avoid duplication and to build on existing achievements.
VIII. What has
the SDNP and like initiatives taught us about using the Internet for development
communications
Some observations and reactions recorded by SDNP concerning
the Internet
-
While understanding of the Internet is superficial in
many of the poorest developing countries, interest is very high among nearly
all of the key decision makers we have met
-
Many developing countries, especially the poorest, need
technical assistance to help them develop and implement appropriate strategies
for national telecommunications services, including the development of
Internet services. Very few countries have developed national information
strategies and plans
-
Only a very few nationals in some of the poorer countries
have the skills to manage Internet servers and sites
-
The Internet is shockingly ‘public’ and much too open
for some
-
Who controls the Internet?
-
Many (most) national telecommunications operators have
limited understanding on the Internet, and are in some cases completely
surpassed by the capacity of the private sector to market and develop Internet
products and services
-
Fear of loss of basic revenues, i.e. international telephone
calls, by national telecommunications operators is a factor of resistance
that impedes the development of the Internet in some developing countries
-
Tariffs for Internet use in many developing countries
are not based on sound market analysis, and are arbitrary at best
-
Nearly all countries want to be present of the Internet.
Priority applications are:
-
Developing a Web site to provide basic information reflecting
the view of the government , the goods and services the country wishes
to trade, etc.
-
Developing government intranets
-
Developing Web sites with information about investment
opportunities, government policies and tourism information
-
Email continues to be the most important and accessible
application for users in developing countries
-
Cybercafes are now appearing, but are still relatively
high priced by developing country standards
-
Concern about the ramifications of the information contained
on the Internet raises ire and fear in some national interlocutors
-
Rural access to the Internet is very limited, but community
access services are gaining precedence as a model for the delivery of a
variety of value added telecommunications services, including Internet
services
-
Distance learning is emerging as a priority application
for local and community development
-
The concept of the telecentre is receiving attention
from development agencies as a way of delivering value added telecommunications
services on a community basis.
a) Some
examples how the Internet has been used to influence policy formulation
and decision making in general as it relates to sustainable human development
Examples of how the Internet has been used
to affect key governance and/or development policies:
-
The UNCED Process: PrepComs, NGO consultations,
preparation of Agenda 21, the Earth Negotiations Bulletin that published
proceedings as and when they occurred
-
The Earth Negotiations Bulletin coverage of
post UNCED conferences on the United Nations: sustainable development news
reporting at UN development conferences!
-
WTO and the Multilateral Agreement on Investment
(MAI)
-
UNDP SDNP in general, and specifically:
-
Chad
-
Pakistan
-
BellaNet: to encourage greater collaboration
and thus better governance in international development planning and programming
The lessons learnt by the
UNDP SDNP:
-
Government decision makers in developing countries
want to know. They are extremely curious and eventually, very keen on the
Internet, especially as it applies to education and research, business
promotion and trade development, and to promoting their national interests
and points of view
-
Decision makers in developing countries see
the development benefits of the Internet. Some are prepared to commit their
own funds and to ask for outside help
-
Decision makers in developing countries want
the Internet for a variety of reasons
-
For professional reasons: to stay in touch
with colleagues, researchers, etc. by email (especially for recent graduates
used to using the Internet)
-
For personal reasons: to stay in touch with
friends and relatives
-
For increased communications with donors and
other development actors
-
For trade promotion, to attract investors,
to develop information ‘windows’ or kiosks on their country, etc.
-
For specific applications: distance learning,
local and community development through telecentres, etc.
-
For public relations, and to communicate their
policies and to counter unfavorable ‘press’ or influences
-
For reasons of prestige, to save face, not
to be left behind, especially in the light of competing and/or neighbouring
countries that are using the Internet to affirm their presence and promote
their countries
-
For intelligence gathering using the Internet,
especially regarding what certain organisations such as The Economist
Intelligence Unit, Amnesty International and others may be saying
about these countries.
-
When informed about the importance of the
Internet, decision makers want to be part of the action and want to influence
or control the development of the Internet in their countries
-
Government leaders want to save face and have
an opportunity to tell their side of the story and counter unwelcome /
unauthorized publicity about national policies
-
Trends: Countries are becoming more aware
of the need for developing policies to deal with the Internet.
-
Killer apps: an Internet wish list as expressed
by policy makers in developing countries
-
Distance learning: wiring all university campuses
and research institutes or centres across a country, and linking them together
and to the Internet
-
Government intranets with leased line access
to the Internet for key ministries: Office of the President / Prime Minister,
Planning, Finances, Foreign Affairs (linking with embassies)
-
Local and governmental Web servers, containing
locally produced information and knowledge resources, contacts, directories,
etc.
-
Tele-medicine applications linking local universities
to medical centres of excellence around the world
-
Community access centres or telecentres for
value added telecommunications, especially in remote locations. How to
build on existing ‘tele-boutiques’. Community access centres for local
and community development, for business incubators, for job creation, for
distance learning, for training and lifelong learning, etc.
-
Remote transaction processing for job creation
-
More support for the UNDP SDNP and like activities
-
To this we would add:
-
A national information strategy
-
Policies to encourage the purchase of the
hardware and software required for people to use the Internet and related
technologies
-
Internet access fees that correspond to the
realities of the market, and not just to the rates arbitrarily applied
by ISPs elsewhere
-
Greater collaboration between donors
b) Some
pioneering organizations first active in using the Internet to influence
opinion and decision making in the realm of international development
Organizations that used the Internet (mostly email, newsgroups and electronic
mailing lists) to mobilize resources and to lobby over issues of common
concern
-
The Association for Progressive Communications (APC)
and related networks (GreenNet, Web, Esanet, HealthNet, Mango, etc.)
-
TCN
-
Poptel / GeoNet
-
The Third World Network (TWN), with HQ is Malaysia
-
Associacao para Projetos de Combate a Fome: Brazilian
Institute of Economic and Social Analysis (IBASE)
-
NGONet
-
FOE International
-
The Environment Liaison Centre International (ELCI)
-
National NGOs using FidoNet and uucp to exchange email
Organizations
that used and/or promoted the use of the Internet (originally mostly email,
newsgroups and electronic mailing lists) to network for scientific and
educational reasons:
-
The International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
of Canada
-
Unesco
-
CGNet - initially supported by IDRC - and the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)
-
Universities in the North and some in the South as well
(BitNet, EARN, etc.)
-
As well as users of uucp (a computer to computer communications
protocol), and to a lesser extent, research and academic networks.
C) Examples
of the use of the Internet in SDNP countries in relation to policy formulation
The case of Bénin
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:02:34 +0200
From: Corbin Michel GUEDEGBE <mcgued@bow.intnet.bj>
To: SDNP <sdnpmgrs@sdnp.undp.org>,
Richard Labelle <rlabelle@netserver.web.net>
Cc: Corbin Michel GUEDEGBE <mcgued@bow.intnet.bj>
Subject: Examples of the Internet / SDNP influencing
policy making
Hi Richard,
In response to your message I would like to
share with you one experience which might be relevant to your paper.
As you know, SDNP-Benin aims to establish a national
network for communication and information exchange on sustainable development,
a national Intranet. Since we became operational in early 1998 we have
focused on information and training of various categories of actors and
stakeholders in order to build national awareness and capacity as regards
NTIC. We’ve been doing this through seminars targeting for example journalists,
Steering Committee members, Chamber of Commerce members and policymakers
in various areas such as the Constitutional Court members and the Communication
and Audiovisual Authority (Haute Autorité de l’Audiovisuel et de
la Communication / HAAC).
The HAAC is responsible for formulating policies
concerning news media and communication in general and for licensing private
Press (radio and TV stations as well as newspapers).
The Seminar SDNP-Benin organized last February
for HAAC members brought a change in the way this major institution performs
its functions.
During the practical session of the NTIC (Internet)
Seminar, while participants were visiting various websites of their French
counterpart institution (Conseil Supérieur de l’Audovisuel), the
Chairman of the HAAC realized that some specific documents he had requested
from France and was still expecting were available on the website and could
be downloaded and printed .
This awareness of the usefulness of NTIC had the
following impact on the work and organizational life of the HAAC:
-The HAAC could save considerable time and
become more effective. It did not have to wait for these specific documents
to arrive from France before continuing its deliberations on the policy
it was formulating
-the previous resistance to NTIC of some members
of the HAAC disappeared
-the Chairman of the HAAC decided to obtain
full Internet connection for his institution and this was done within less
than a week. He is even now thinking of establishing an Intranet for the
HAAC.
I hope this experience will be useful to you.
Regards
Corbin Michel Guedegbe
National Coordinator, SDNP-Benin
The case of Pakistan
There have been many instances where we have used
the Internet to provide timely critical information and expert advice on
a number of issues. The latest was an SOS (on behalf of IUCN, Pakistan)
that we sent out in the wake of an oil spill that occurred off the Pasni
coast (near Karachi) about 20 days ago. This was posted on about 20 mailing
lists and conferences and we got some very useful feedback from a number
of experts around the world.
Here I am quoting two such examples -- am posting
this on the list as well for it might be interesting to my other colleagues.
The first one is a case of electronic networking for disaster management
while the other recounts the use of Internet in a public litigation case.
1- The Toxic Dump Episode and E-mail
In the month of May 1993, an unscrupulous operator
had dumped about 2.5 tons of a highly toxic chemical substance, meta-dinitrobenzene
near a railway station in Karachi. It was picked up by an unsuspecting
godown owner as probably something useful. This person and his driver died
as a result of inhaling the toxic fumes from the chemical. The local police
impounded the material, and not knowing what it was -- they were lead into
believing that it was potassium or sodium cyanide from the toxic effects
that it had caused -- dumped it into the Lyari river, which has increasingly
been turned into more of a sewage channel than a river. But by then the
story had been reported in a national newspaper causing great concern among
the environmentally conscious public. The IUCN Pakistan played a key role
from then on in highlighting the potential hazards and the
need for the safe disposal, or at least the detoxification of the material.
It was taken out from the river and a sample of it tested under the IUCN's
auspices in a well known research institute of chemistry. It was identified
as meta- dinitrobenzene, a highly toxic and potentially explosive chemical.
The various government and non-government agencies that were involved in
this operation had little idea about the safe handling and disposal of
the substance.
We now come to a part of the story which is
both heart warming and an indicator of what can be achieved through the
medium of electronic mail (e-mail). The SDN Pakistan, on receiving this
information from the IUCN sent an SOS via e-mail. This appeal for information
and expert advice was put in some of the conferences, like en.toxics on
PeaceNet and en.alerts on EcoNet of the Association of Progressive Communications
(APC). The response was nothing short of overwhelming -- both through fax
and e-mail. Though it was a rather technical question needing very specialized
knowledge, more than 50 Individuals and organizations responded with concrete
suggestions and offers of help. There were responses from places as diverse
as Brazil and Finland, Newzealand and Switzerland apart from more "expected"
places like US, UK, Germany etc.. The respondents not only included US
organizations like Environmental Protection Agency, American Lung Association,
National Institute of Environmental Health and Sciences and experts in
related fields, but also a number of students and concerned individuals,
including Pakistani expatriates. Some of these concerned individuals went
to the extent of searching commercial databases to retrieve useful information,
while others sent comprehensive fact sheets (more than 20 pages in one
instance) covering topics like the properties of
the substance, how to handle it, known effects on human beings and possible
ways of detoxification and disposal. This information which kept trickling
in, was enough to compile a small book on the subject.
The story had a happy ending when the toxic
material was safely incinerated under expert supervision.
This incident which took place almost immediately
after the inception of SDNP, Pakistan brought into sharp relief the role
for which the national SDNPs had been created under Agenda 21. Timely information
for disaster management is an important component of sustainable development,
and the global dimension in this episode -- the fact that this information
came from diverse sources from different parts of the world -- makes it
a far potent real life example of the necessity and effectiveness of SDNPs
than many hypothetical ones cited in the promotion literature.
Ours is a network devoted to providing access and
dissemination of information on sustainable development. Though such information
is regularly distributed through a number of discussion lists and offline
conferences, there are times when specific information is critically needed.
The following 'story' is about one such instance -- one of the first ever
public interest litigation cases in Pakistan. It is narrated by Mr. Mohammad
Yasin of SDPI (Sustainable Development Policy Institute), Islamabad.
2- Internet Helps in Public Interest Litigation
CASE
Residents of a densely populated sector of Islamabad
(Pakistan), one day saw massive cutting of trees. This was being done by
the relevant government agencies to construct an electric grid station
within 40 feet of the houses. Threatened by the adverse effects of the
electromagnetic fields on human health, particularly for children and pregnant
women, the residents filed a writ petition for violation of human rights
in the Supreme Court (SC). The Sustainable Development
Policy Institute (SDPI) was made a party to the case.
The SDPI sent out an appeal on the Internet
through SDNP for latest research evidence and for legal advice. Within
24 hours, evidence and legal advice started coming in. This was in the
shape of laws on the 'right of way' of grid stations, transmission lines
and research papers. Equipped with convincing evidence SDPI and petitioners'
counsel argued in the SC.
The case goes on. However, the SC has constituted
a Technical Committee, has directed the relevant government agencies and
the committee to invite public debate and public hearings. The agency has
been directed that while planning future grid stations, these will be publicized
and public hearings will be held. The government has been directed to constitute
a commission for the purpose and relevant agency will commence research
on the subject.
The SC Order was made use of in a similar case in
Indonesia. This was made possible
thanks to email, SDNP and the Internet.
Author: Mohammad Yasin,
Sustainable Development Policy Institute,
Islamabad, Pakistan
-- Apart from these examples, SDNP Pakistan, during
its initial phase (93-94) worked in close concert with the Information
and Communications Cell of the Prime Minister's Committee for Research
and Analysis (CRA) to prepare a policy paper that strongly recommended
opening data network operations to the private sector. This was accepted
and implemented by the Government of Pakistan (GOP), which over a period
of 2-3 years, dramatically changed the networking scene in the country.
Cheers,
-Hasan
Sustainable Development Networking Programme, Phone:
051-270684,270691
PO Box 3099, House 12, Street 85, G-6/4, Fax: 051-270688
Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. email: rizvi@sdnpk.undp.org
Richard Labelle (rlabelle@web.net)
| Brochures |
Workshops |
Papers |
Evaluations |
SIS |
Guidelines |
|